International Photographers Association of Los Angeles 洛杉磯國際攝影家協會

We don't make a photograph just with a camera; we bring to the act of photography all the books we have read, the movies we have seen, the music we have heard, the people we have loved. -Ansel Adams
現在的時間是 週二 11月 19, 2024 7:12 am

所有顯示的時間為 UTC - 8 小時 [ DST ]




發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 93 篇文章 ]  前往頁數 上一頁  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  下一頁
發表人 內容
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:27 pm 
離線
左庶长
左庶长
頭像

註冊時間: 週四 2月 15, 2007 5:33 pm
文章: 726
來自: Los Angeles
Hasu 寫:
云中漫步 寫:
我是在起哄,不算。

你和哈苏兄继续PK...

peterlee 寫:
不敢苟同上面两位的说法,有句行话:


来呀来呀,行云,一起跟着起哄,热闹着呢。


继续PK,看的很过瘾,守在线上看你们PK,严重关注。


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:28 pm 
離線
大夫
大夫
頭像

註冊時間: 週二 3月 06, 2007 7:47 pm
文章: 237
peterlee 寫:
Hasu 寫:
I use ISO 800 5.6 1/6, hehe



You can't get the sharp images your clients deserve if you did so....


True! I suggest you do an exeriment: shoot pictures with both lens, ask your client to pick. Then you will know the result.

_________________
哈苏


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:30 pm 
離線
五大夫
五大夫

註冊時間: 週二 3月 06, 2007 7:34 pm
文章: 521
來自: LA
Danny Dong 寫:
Hasu 寫:
云中漫步 寫:
我是在起哄,不算。

你和哈苏兄继续PK...

peterlee 寫:
不敢苟同上面两位的说法,有句行话:


来呀来呀,行云,一起跟着起哄,热闹着呢。


继续PK,看的很过瘾,守在线上看你们PK,严重关注。


我也盯着呢!


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:32 pm 
離線
左更
左更
頭像

註冊時間: 週二 2月 20, 2007 9:16 am
文章: 1086
來自: MD/DC
Hasu 寫:
peterlee 寫:
Hasu 寫:
peterlee 寫:
不敢苟同上面两位的说法,有句行话:

Wedding deserves the best !

I don't know how can you shoot with the 28-200/3.5-5.6 lens without using the flash during the ceremony in the dark church, and the normal case for church is ISO 1600 f/2.8 1/30sec.... ?

Also if you are professional please use pro equipment to do your job.

The 28-300/3.5-5.6 lens is a very good choice for a second shooter for day light wedding or so...


Peter


These days, community photographers are equiped with the top line gears, those so called pros lost their customer base. Don't you see those poor guys at wedding, at school, at corperate event..... hold the craked equipments, sometime tighten with duct tape and robber bands. Hehe, they care about money, not the customer. But not 业余photographers, because they are 业余, including me myself. My boss, a 28 year 100% wedding pro, don't even have any 2.8 lens. But he has 2 30+ foot boats.


I see your point.

Someone do photography for the money, but others do it with their heart, i never see top wedding photographers using consumer grade equipment.

If just for the money, we should do something else :D

Still Wedding deserves the BEST....that's what i believe...



always shoot wedding with passion, be the brother and sister of the bride, then you will find the romantic moment. Pros count the number shot, not 业余摄影师; pro calculate the depreciation of the equipments, not 业余摄影师; pros count the time spent at weeding, not 业余摄影师. So I think these day, smart customers pick a good 业余摄影师, not a pro.


Well said :)

But most called pro do an average job compared with semi-pro photographer, why ? You can't evaluate one's photography skill and talent by how long he/she have been in the field... most older wedding photographers can't follow up with the technology and the trend, they only charge $1500 per wedding or so, while other charge average $3500 and up....

That's the reality ! face it.......

Equipment is not the most important part for photographym, the photographer is the key, but if you are a good photographer and have the enough income from your photographey business, you should get the best you deserve......


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:33 pm 
離線
公大夫
公大夫
頭像

註冊時間: 週三 3月 14, 2007 6:46 pm
文章: 385
就好象武侠小说里的绝世高手, 摘叶伤人, 可要是其他等次的人如果都学只用树叶的话, 估计会死的很快, 根本没有下一次的机会. 因为对于新手来说, 一次失败的机会就有可能有灭顶之灾, 但大师名声在外的话, 就算偶然一次拍的很烂, 我想顾客也不会很criticize. :lol: :lol: :lol:


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:37 pm 
離線
五大夫
五大夫

註冊時間: 週二 3月 06, 2007 7:34 pm
文章: 521
來自: LA
peterlee 寫:
Hasu 寫:
peterlee 寫:
Hasu 寫:
peterlee 寫:
不敢苟同上面两位的说法,有句行话:

Wedding deserves the best !

I don't know how can you shoot with the 28-200/3.5-5.6 lens without using the flash during the ceremony in the dark church, and the normal case for church is ISO 1600 f/2.8 1/30sec.... ?

Also if you are professional please use pro equipment to do your job.

The 28-300/3.5-5.6 lens is a very good choice for a second shooter for day light wedding or so...


Peter


These days, community photographers are equiped with the top line gears, those so called pros lost their customer base. Don't you see those poor guys at wedding, at school, at corperate event..... hold the craked equipments, sometime tighten with duct tape and robber bands. Hehe, they care about money, not the customer. But not 业余photographers, because they are 业余, including me myself. My boss, a 28 year 100% wedding pro, don't even have any 2.8 lens. But he has 2 30+ foot boats.


I see your point.

Someone do photography for the money, but others do it with their heart, i never see top wedding photographers using consumer grade equipment.

If just for the money, we should do something else :D

Still Wedding deserves the BEST....that's what i believe...



always shoot wedding with passion, be the brother and sister of the bride, then you will find the romantic moment. Pros count the number shot, not 业余摄影师; pro calculate the depreciation of the equipments, not 业余摄影师; pros count the time spent at weeding, not 业余摄影师. So I think these day, smart customers pick a good 业余摄影师, not a pro.


Well said :)

But most called pro do an average job compared with semi-pro photographer, why ? You can't evaluate one's photography skill and talent by how long he/she have been in the field... most older wedding photographers can't follow up with the technology and the trend, they only charge $1500 per wedding or so, while other charge average $3500 and up....

That's the reality ! face it.......

Equipment is not the most important part for photographym, the photographer is the key, but if you are a good photographer and have the enough income from your photographey business, you should get the best you deserve......


没错,创造出的价值,应该获得.


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:40 pm 
離線
大夫
大夫
頭像

註冊時間: 週二 3月 06, 2007 7:47 pm
文章: 237
FOr my boss, there several reasons for him not to carry the top line lenses:
1) too heavy to carry with and too hassle to change during the shooting
2) potentiallt lost equipments (theft sometime)
3) Not many customers are fine art style, acctually the majority of them are at regular price and only expect the journalist style pictures. So that not demanding best lens for the job
4) business man's schema: saving money for the off best work.
5) already stable customer base

_________________
哈苏


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:41 pm 
離線
五大夫
五大夫

註冊時間: 週二 3月 06, 2007 7:34 pm
文章: 521
來自: LA
HOUSCOUS 寫:
就好象武侠小说里的绝世高手, 摘叶伤人, 可要是其他等次的人如果都学只用树叶的话, 估计会死的很快, 根本没有下一次的机会. 因为对于新手来说, 一次失败的机会就有可能有灭顶之灾, 但大师名声在外的话, 就算偶然一次拍的很烂, 我想顾客也不会很criticize. :lol: :lol: :lol:


赞成!机遇加智慧等于成功!


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:41 pm 
離線
左更
左更
頭像

註冊時間: 週二 2月 20, 2007 9:16 am
文章: 1086
來自: MD/DC
Hasu 寫:
peterlee 寫:
Hasu 寫:
I use ISO 800 5.6 1/6, hehe



You can't get the sharp images your clients deserve if you did so....


True! I suggest you do an exeriment: shoot pictures with both lens, ask your client to pick. Then you will know the result.


There are many smart customers out there, i have shot a weeding of one well-know local wedding photographer's daughter's wedding, how can i show up with a $200 zoom lens as main lens, no way !

Also i think we have the different philosphies on this topic..
I suggest your boss to buy some point and shoot camera, that will say some money and can get the job done too...

Cheer :)


最後由 peter 於 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:45 pm 編輯, 總共編輯了 4 次

回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:43 pm 
離線
左庶长
左庶长
頭像

註冊時間: 週四 2月 15, 2007 5:33 pm
文章: 726
來自: Los Angeles
HOUSCOUS 寫:
就好象武侠小说里的绝世高手, 摘叶伤人, 可要是其他等次的人如果都学只用树叶的话, 估计会死的很快, 根本没有下一次的机会. 因为对于新手来说, 一次失败的机会就有可能有灭顶之灾, 但大师名声在外的话, 就算偶然一次拍的很烂, 我想顾客也不会很criticize. :lol: :lol: :lol:


很有道理,所以或许正是因为这样的压力,往往semi-pro的人拍的更用心,拍前准备更充分。反而pro的大师们可能不在乎了。就象学校里的教授一旦拿到tenure,教课就越教越烂。


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:43 pm 
離線
大夫
大夫
頭像

註冊時間: 週二 3月 06, 2007 7:47 pm
文章: 237
近朱者赤,我是PRO的受害者,大家别跟我学啊!就象破片不能看一样,伤眼球。 :roll:

_________________
哈苏


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:44 pm 
離線
五大夫
五大夫

註冊時間: 週二 3月 06, 2007 7:34 pm
文章: 521
來自: LA
Hasu 寫:
FOr my boss, there several reasons for him not to carry the top line lenses:
1) too heavy to carry with and too hassle to change during the shooting
2) potentiallt lost equipments (theft sometime)
3) Not many customers are fine art style, acctually the majority of them are at regular price and only expect the journalist style pictures. So that not demanding best lens for the job
4) business man's schema: saving money for the off best work.
5) already stable customer base


呵呵,也对,谁都想用最小的资本获取最大的利润.


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:49 pm 
離線
大夫
大夫
頭像

註冊時間: 週二 3月 06, 2007 7:47 pm
文章: 237
Danny Dong 寫:
HOUSCOUS 寫:
就好象武侠小说里的绝世高手, 摘叶伤人, 可要是其他等次的人如果都学只用树叶的话, 估计会死的很快, 根本没有下一次的机会. 因为对于新手来说, 一次失败的机会就有可能有灭顶之灾, 但大师名声在外的话, 就算偶然一次拍的很烂, 我想顾客也不会很criticize. :lol: :lol: :lol:


很有道理,所以或许正是因为这样的压力,往往semi-pro的人拍的更用心,拍前准备更充分。反而pro的大师们可能不在乎了。就象学校里的教授一旦拿到tenure,教课就越教越烂。


同理,同理。

_________________
哈苏


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:52 pm 
離線
大夫
大夫
頭像

註冊時間: 週二 3月 06, 2007 7:47 pm
文章: 237
DIVE 寫:
Hasu 寫:
FOr my boss, there several reasons for him not to carry the top line lenses:
1) too heavy to carry with and too hassle to change during the shooting
2) potentiallt lost equipments (theft sometime)
3) Not many customers are fine art style, acctually the majority of them are at regular price and only expect the journalist style pictures. So that not demanding best lens for the job
4) business man's schema: saving money for the off best work.
5) already stable customer base


呵呵,也对,谁都想用最小的资本获取最大的利润.


没错, 商人的本性吗。

_________________
哈苏


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 3月 22, 2007 8:54 pm 
離線
大夫
大夫
頭像

註冊時間: 週二 3月 06, 2007 7:47 pm
文章: 237
peterlee 寫:
Hasu 寫:
peterlee 寫:
Hasu 寫:
I use ISO 800 5.6 1/6, hehe



You can't get the sharp images your clients deserve if you did so....


True! I suggest you do an exeriment: shoot pictures with both lens, ask your client to pick. Then you will know the result.


There are many smart customers out there, i have shot a weeding of one well-know local wedding photographer's daughter's wedding, how can i show up with a $200 zoom lens as main lens, no way !

Also i think we have the different philosphies on this topic..
I suggest your boss to buy some point and shoot camera, that will say some money and can get the job done too...

Cheer :)


I don't think that is a fact. He uses 2 5D bodies, best body in the world.

_________________
哈苏


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
顯示文章 :  排序  
發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 93 篇文章 ]  前往頁數 上一頁  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  下一頁

所有顯示的時間為 UTC - 8 小時 [ DST ]


誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者: Majestic-12 [Bot] 和 49 位訪客


不能 在這個版面發表主題
不能 在這個版面回覆主題
不能 在這個版面編輯文章
不能 在這個版面刪除文章
不能 在這個版面上傳附加檔案

搜尋:
前往 :  
POWERED_BY
正體中文語系由 竹貓星球 維護製作